The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail

Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail shopping experience:

1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.

2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about

3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail? Wrong! If the The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.

4. Questions - Got a question about The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....

5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.

6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.

7. Feedback - happy with your The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.

8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site

9. Contact - got a question about The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.

10. Payment - ready to pay for your The Holy Blood And The Holy Grail, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.

"Holy Blood" redirects here. For the folk metal band, see Holy Blood (band).

The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail (retitled Holy Blood, Holy Grail in the United States) is a List of controversial non-fiction books by Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh (author), and Henry Lincoln, which was based in large part on Pierre Plantard’s Priory of Sion.

The book was first published in 1982 by Jonathan Cape in London, as a follow-up to a BBC TV documentary on the series Chronicle. A sequel to the book, called The Messianic Legacy, was published in 1987. The original work was reissued in an illustrated hardcover version in 2005. One of the books, according to the authors, which influenced the project was L’Or de Rennes (later re-published as Le Trésor Maudit), a 1967 book by Gérard de Sède.

In this book, the authors do not make an argument as such. Rather, they put forth a historical hypothesis, one which they repeatedly stress as having limited or inconclusive (but nonetheless significant) evidence. The hypothesis, put simply, is that Jesus married Mary Magdalene, had one or more children, and that Jesus bloodline emigrated to what is now southern France. Once there, they intermarried with the nobility that would eventually become the Merovingian dynasty, whose special claim to the throne of France is championed today by a secret society called the Priory of Sion.

An international bestseller upon its release, The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail spurred interest in a number of ideas related to its central thesis. Response from mainstream historians and academics, however, was almost universally negative. Professional historians argued that the bulk of the claims, ancient mysteries and conspiracy theories presented as fact, are pseudohistorical. Nevertheless, these ideas would be very successfully fictionalised by Dan Brown in 2003 in his runaway best-seller novel The Da Vinci Code, even using Richard Leigh’s and Michael Baigent’s last names (Baigent's scrambled) for the character Leigh Teabing.

Content The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail details the authors’ investigation (starting in the 1960s) of the alleged mysteries of the village of Rennes-le-Château in southern France. In the late 19th century, a pastor of the village, Bérenger Saunière, decorated his church with bizarre images, became mysteriously wealthy, and was refused absolution by the priest who came to his death bed. The authors sought to determine why.

After over a decade of research and speculation, Baigent, Leigh, and Lincoln came to the following hypotheses:

’s Et in Arcadia ego features prominently in the authors’ quest

That there is a secret society known as Priory of Sion that has a long and illustrious history dating back to the First Crusade. The order is led by a Grand master (order) or Nautonnier.
That the Priory of Sion created the Knights Templar as its military and financial front.
That the Priory is devoted to returning the Merovingian dynasty, that ruled the Franks until 751 AD, to the thrones of Europe and Jerusalem.
That the order protects these royal claimants because they may be the literal descendants of Jesus and his wife, Mary Magdalene, or, at the very least, of King David.
That the Roman Catholic Church tried to kill off all remnants of this dynasty and their guardians, the Cathars and the Knights Templar, in order to maintain power through the apostolic succession of Saint Peter, instead of the dynasty of Mary Magdalene.

These authors further mused that the ultimate goals of the Priory of Sion are:

The founding of a “Theocracy United States of Europe” that would become the next hyperpower and usher in a New World Order (political) of peace and prosperity;
the establishment of a Messianism Mystery religion state religion by revealing the Holy Grail;
The grooming and installing of a “Rex Deus” pretender on the throne of a Greater Israel.

Influence and similarities

The Jesus Scroll, written by Australian Donovan Joyce and first published in 1972, was an early attempt by an author to claim that Jesus and Mary Magdalene had been married and had a son together.
Umberto Eco’s novel Foucault's Pendulum (1988) mentions the Jesus-Mary Magdalene idea in passing (a quote from the book is in fact one of the chapter headings). However, Eco the rational humanist takes a negative stance on such conspiracy theories. The resurgence of interest in the topic has recently sparked the colourful description “a thinking man’s Da Vinci Code” for Eco’s book.
The novel The Children of the Grail (1996) by Peter Berling incorporates the bloodline of Jesus and Mary Magdalene as a central part of the plot.
The third installment of the Gabriel Knight series Blood of the Sacred, Blood of the Damned (1999) used the idea that Jesus and Mary Magdalene had children as one of the basic structures of the storyline, however tying it together with a number of other myths in an original story. “Et in Arcadia ego” is also an important object, with the characters finding important clues in the picture.
Elements from the book are used as background in the time-travel novels Arthur War Lord and Far Beyond the Wave, by Dafydd ab Hugh.
Most recently, author Dan Brown in his bestseller The Da Vinci Code (2003), makes reference to this book, also liberally using most of the above claims as key plot elements; indeed, in 2005 Baigent and Leigh unsuccessfully sued Brown’s publisher, Random House, for plagiarism, on the grounds that Brown's book makes extensive use of their research and that one of the characters is named Leigh, has a surname (Teabing) which is an anagram of Baigent, and has a physical description strongly resembling Henry Lincoln. In his novel, Brown also mentions Holy Blood, Holy Grail as an acclaimed international bestseller (chapter 60) and claims it as the major contributor to his hypothesis. Perhaps as a result of this mention, the authors (minus Henry Lincoln) of Holy Blood sued Dan Brown for copyright infringement. They claimed that the central framework of their plot had been stolen for the writing of The Da Vinci Code. The claim was overturned by High Court of Justice Judge Peter Smith (judge) on 6 April 2006, who ruled that “their argument was vague and shifted course during the trial and was always based on a weak foundation.” In fact, it was found that the publicity of the trial had significantly boosted sales of Holy Blood. The court ruled that, in effect, because it was published as a work of (alleged) history, its premises legally could be freely interpreted in any subsequent fictional work without any copyright infringement.
The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception.
The video game Broken Sword: The Shadow of the Templars references this book as well, in the form of dialogue when the player asks what a character knows of the Templars.
Allusions are to be found also in T.S. Eliot, and by Philip Johnson, Glass House.

Criticism The claims made in The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail have been the source of much investigation and criticism over the years, with many independent investigators such as 60 Minutes, Time Magazine, and the BBC claiming that many of the book’s claims are not credible or verifiable.

The “Priory of Sion”, which was central to the authors' hypothesis in Holy Blood Holy Grail, never actually existed as described. Far from having a “history (that) spanned more than a millennium,” the Priory was a hoax created by a pretender to the throne of France, Pierre Plantard, a convicted con-man, in 1956. As part of his hoax, Plantard had planted two sets of forged medieval documents: one in the Bibliothèque nationale de France, and another in the 1967 book Le Trésor Maudit de Rennes-le-Chateau. (For more details, see The Priory of Sion, Rennes-le-Chateau, and Pierre Plantard). The authors' hypothesis in The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail was significantly premised on the veracity of these documents. As a result, the revelation that the Priory documents were indeed fabricated serves to detract from much of the book's impact and plausibility.

Other critics have argued that one of the book's hypotheses — that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married — was not original to Holy Blood, but had in fact been proposed previously many times. For example, in a 1971 article in The Observer, it was proposed by theologian Charles Davis, who also pointed to the implications in the Gospel of Philip, the Gnostic Gospel written over a thousand years ago.

In 2005, Tony Robinson narrated a critical evaluation of the main arguments of Dan Brown and those of Baigent, Leigh and Lincoln, The Real Da Vinci Code, shown on Channel 4. The programme featured lengthy interviews with many of the main protagonists. Arnaud de Sède, son of Gérard de Sède, stated categorically that his father and Plantard had made up the existence of the Prieuré de Sion, and described the story as “piffle.” The programme concluded that, in the opinion of the presenter and researchers, the claims of “Holy Blood” were based on little more than a series of guesses.

Some scholars of esoteric history consider the controversial Sicilian Traditionalist Julius Evola's (1898-1974) The Mystery of the Grail on the Holy Grail as sources for Pierre Plantard's claims ().

Quotations

It is typical of my unregenerable soul that I can only see this as a marvellous theme for a novel.—Anthony Burgess, writing about The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail in The Observer.

It would be quite wrong if fictional writers were to have their writings pored over in the way DVC has been pored over in this case by authors of pretend historical books to make an allegation of infringement of copyright.—Judge Peter Smith (judge), in his ruling that the Da Vinci Code lawsuit was “based on a contrived and selective number of facts and ideas.”

The Templar-Grail myth... is at the heart of the most notorious of all the Grail pseudo-histories, The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail, which is a classic example of the conspiracy theory of history... It is essentially a text which proceeds by innuendo, not by refutable scholarly debate... Essentially, the whole argument is an ingeniously constructed series of suppositions combined with forced readings of such tangible facts as are offered.” Richard Barber (2004). The Holy Grail, The History of a Legend. (ISBN 0-14026-765-4)

References

Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh, and Henry Lincoln (1982). The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail. (ISBN 0-385-33859-7)
Michael Baigent, Richard Leigh and Henry Lincoln. The Messianic Legacy, 1987 (1989 reissue: ISBN 0-440-20319-8)
Smith, Paul. Priory-of-Sion